Psychometric Tests in Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Asia, Australia, UK. Aptitude and Personality Tests for Recruitment, Selection and Development.
Aptitude Tests | Personality Tests | Psychometric Training | 360° Appraisal  
Psychometric Assessment
Psychometric Tests and Psychometric Training from Organisational Psychologists
Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, China, Australia, UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia & UK
 
 
Search
Email Us
Call Us
Sitemap
Australian Psychological Society Psychologist
  Home     Aptitude Tests     Personality Tests     Psychometric Training     Online Psychometric Courses     360° Appraisal     Knowledgebase     Blog          Contact  
Psychometric Assessment Blog
 

Archive for the ‘Psychometric Tests’ Category

Proctored Versus Unproctored Internet Psychometric Tests: Are unproctored noncognitive tests as predictive of job performance?

Tuesday, March 8th, 2011

As the usage of unproctored Internet testing (UIT) increases in selection settings, concerns about the validity of such practices must be addressed. While recent examinations of the issue have focused primarily on the practicality, ethics, and potential legal ramifications of UIT, this paper provides an examination of the criterion-related validity of unproctored assessments. Using a database of validity evidence, we examine the predictive validity of several noncognitive assessments (i.e., personality and biodata) with respect to a number of subjective and objective job performance metrics. Results generally indicate that assessments administered in proctored and unproctored settings have similar validities. Limitations of this research and implications for practice are discussed.

View full article here: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/ijsa/2011/00000019/00000001/art00001

This abstract can be found at PsyAsia International’s HRM and Work Psychology/Psychometrics Articles feed at http://www.psyasia.com/hrm_resources.php.

Complimentary Psychometrics Webinar: Questions HR should and should not ask when “evaluating” Psychometric Tests

Friday, February 18th, 2011

Psychometrics Webinar

PsyAsia International invites you to a complimentary webinar that will cover the questions HR Professionals should and should not ask when evaluating psychometric tests. The facilitator will show you the materials referred to in the questions that you need to ask and show you how to evaluate a test distributor’s response.

This free webinar is open to all HR and related professionals based in Asia. It is not open to competitors.

You’ll go away knowing the top-5 questions to ask when evaluating a psychometric test and how to evaluate those responses at a basic level. You’ll also find out what questions are frequently asked but really should have no bearing in test choice. There will be ample time for participant questions.

REGISTER HERE: http://www.psyasia.com/hr_seminars.php

Human Resources, Recruitment & Psychometric Tests: The Right Questions to Ask When Evaluating Personality & Aptitude Tests

Thursday, February 10th, 2011

Introduction
Those without training in psychometrics can never effectively evaluate a psychometric test.
The following very briefly gives an overview of the questions HR should be asking when contacting test vendors.
This brief presentation is not intended to replace competent training in psychometrics.

What is the test’s rationale?
Is the vendor clear on the model behind the test?
What was the test designed to assess?
Who designed the test?

Technical data: Reliability
How consistently does the test measure what it purports to measure?
Are there documented studies to support for example test-retest reliability and internal consistency reliability? Look for .7 for personality scales and .8 for aptitude.
Does the vendor have a clue as to what you are talking about?

Technical data: Validity
Are there documented studies which show the test is “fit for purpose”?
Is there evidence for criterion validity if you will use the test to predict performance directly? Look for significant and meaningful correlations between test score and performance. How does this compare with competitors?
Is there evidence for construct validity if you will use the test to assess various aspects of personality or aptitude that you will compare to others in the belief that higher scores in these areas will lead to performance in your job? Look for significant correlations between this test and another established test assessing similar constructs.

Other aspects of validity
Content Validity
Face Validity

What about training?
If no training is required it’s either a simple test which may not suit your needs or a test that may lead you to make errors in interpretation and decision-making due to insufficient training!
Who runs the training? Is it an expert in psychology/psychometrics whose competence has been assessed by external bodies (government registration and psychological societies)?

More information
www.psyasia.com Knowledgebase
www.psychometricassessment.com/blog
www.psychometricassessment.com/training
http://dates.psyasia.com
Hong Kong(+852) 8200 6005
Singapore (+65) 6521 3131
Malaysia (+60) 03 2782 6928

Psychometric Test Training – BPS Level A & B Certificates in Singapore & Hong Kong – March / August 2011

Thursday, February 10th, 2011

REGISTER ONLINE NOW

#Human Resources Evaluates #Psychometric Tests – Questions that are not worth asking!

Thursday, January 27th, 2011

The WRONG Questions to ask when HR is “Evaluating” Psychometric Tests

Is it a popular test?

A number of poorly developed internet tests are VERY popular but highly UNRELIABLE and not at all VALID!

Likewise, many tests on the market either have low validity overall, or lower validity than a competitor test but may have been adopted by HR for various reasons.

Tests which have been on the market for many years may have become very popular – but do you really want to use tests developed 20 or so years ago?

 Can I see a list of clients who use this test?

This may break privacy and confidentiality agreements that test distributors hold with clients.

Some distributors may be happy to break confidence in order to get a sale – do you want to work with such people?

A new test will have a small client list and yet be the best test on the market!

Perhaps a very good test is rather pricey and only used by the most elite?

 How long have you been selling the test?

If the test is new then the distributor may only have been selling it for a few months. This has no bearing upon the test’s validity.

Likewise, if a distributor has only just started to sell a well known, established test it has no bearing on the test’s validity.

 Is it an easy test to understand?

This question may have some utility in that if the test is hard to understand, you may make selection mistakes. However, the easiest tests to understand usually are based on very simple models that may be unfair to use in predicting human workplace performance. It would be better to opt for more advanced tests that assess a broad range of human aptitudes, talents, motives and competencies and to commit to the necessary training to ensure you can use the test properly.

It’s expensive, perhaps I should go for a cheaper test?

Often, the more expensive tests are so for good reason!  They have been developed well by the best in the field over a number of years and have been appropriately validated.

Always ask yourself about the ROI (return on investment). If you could pay $100 and get a 10% chance of choosing the right candidate or $1000 and have a 60% chance of getting the right candidate – which would you prefer? Most CEOs would opt for the $1000. Likewise, paying a little more for a better test will result in a higher likelihood of getting the right candidate as the test will be more reliable and valid.

 Can I have a free trial?

Free trials don’t assist at all in evaluating the technical properties of a test.

Sometimes, when given free trials, clients reject a test because it is too long or does not have the questions they were expecting. This is subjective. In order to properly evaluate whether a test will predict the work competencies of importance, one needs to assess the test’s technical properties statistically.

 Is it possible to “evaluate” without being trained to do so?

The clear answer is no!

To properly evaluate a test one needs to understand how to assess reliability and validity among other things.  This is a difficult issue – in order to buy into a test and get trained on it you want to know it is a good test, yet you can’t fully evaluate a test until you’ve had training on how to evaluate it! You could have a look through PsyAsia’s blogs and psychometric training sites or attend a general psychometric course though.

 More information

www.psyasia.com Knowledgebase

www.psychometricassessment.com/blog

www.psychometricassessment.com/training

http://dates.psyasia.com – all psychometric test training course dates in Singapore & Hong Kong as well as Online Training in Psychometrics

Hong Kong(+852) 8200 6005

Singapore (+65) 6521 3131

Malaysia (+60) 03 2782 6928

68% of Job Applications Fraudulent in Hong Kong & China – Tips for catching them! #HR #psychometrics

Wednesday, January 26th, 2011

In the Winter edition of the Hong Kong HR Magazine, there was an article that discussed research relating to lies that job applicants make when applying for jobs. Most of the lies appeared in the candidate’s CVs with many candidates inflating their experience and educational qualifications among other things. The application of Scientific Human Resource Processes can help to reduce the hiring mistake of offering a job to a candidate who has provided fake information in their CV.

Many top organisations today use the services of firms who run background checks on applicants to help ensure they do indeed have the educational and experiential backgrounds they claim to have. What else can be done to attack this problem head on?

Psychometric Tests are useful. For example if a candidate claims to have a strong aptitude for an aspect of the job that is not supported by their aptitude test results, this raises serious doubts and should lead to further questioning of the applicant. Personality Assessment results give an indication of whether the applicant has the profile that would fit and work within the employing company. Again, if there is a mismatch between this and the role profile more questions are raised. Furthermore, modern personality questionnaires include scales that assess the extent to which the candidate is responding openly and honestly and may set off alarms with certain applicants.

Behavior-based interviewing (BBI) is an area that can also assist as part of a scientific HR process to ensure validity of the CV.  With BBI, the interviewer will ask applicants questions about their previous experiences and probe for the evidence they need to support the candidate’s application. Well trained interviewers are usually able to tell when candidates are lying or inflating their experiences and expertise.

It has been well known for years that CVs are unreliable and lack validity in predicting job performance. It is far wiser to consider your job competencies first and then design a rigid selection process which includes psychometric tests and behavior-based interviews as well as perhaps assessment centre exercises and work samples for some jobs. Using these more reliable and valid tools will improve the validity of any company’s selection process and therefore the overall productivity of the firm.

PsyAsia International offers world-class training in Behaviour Based Interviewing and Psychometric Assessment as per below.  For details on any of these courses, please go to http://dates.psyasia.com and select the course from the drop down list. To register, simply visit http://www.psyasia.com/register.

Behavior-based Interviewing Course
Singapore: 15 March 2011
Hong Kong: 24 May 2011

Psychometric Assessment at Work Course
British Psychological Society Level A and B Certification
Singapore: 16-18 and 21-23 March 2011
Hong Kong: 2-4 & and 8-10 August 2011

Online Psychometric Test Administration Course
British Psychological Society Test Admin Certification
Available to anybody anywhere (conducted live in English)
15-17 February 2011

Psychometric Test Administration Course
British Psychological Society Test Admin Certification
Singapore: 16 March 2011
Hong Kong: 2 August 2011

Saville Consulting Wave Accreditation Course
Singapore: 24 March 2011 for those with existing personality test accreditation or 24-25 March 2011 for those without.
Hong Kong: 30 May or 11 August for those with existing personality test accreditation or 30-31 May or 11-12 August for those without.

Identity Personality Test Accreditation Course
Singapore: 22-23 March 2011
Hong Kong: 9-10 August 2011

Human Resource Management Course Singapore – FINAL 2 WEEKS of REGISTRATION! (#HRM)

Thursday, January 20th, 2011

PsyAsia’s acclaimed Human Resource Management Course is confirmed to run in Singapore from 22-25 February 2011. The HRM course is run by an award-winning and published Doctoral Level Business Psychologist who also teaches the same course to MSc students in Asia and previously taught for the UK’s University of Leicester in the Middle East.  PsyAsia usually runs this course as an in-house option for governments and multi-nationals across the region. However, due to strong interest we are offering this pubic course opportunity.  Kindly note that this is the only time in 2011 that this course will run as a public course in Singapore!

Places are limited and filling up, so please do register soon. With just over 4 weeks to go until the course and 2 weeks until we need to inform the hotel venue (5-star Conrad Centenial) of delegate numbers, we will be closing registration in 2 weeks time or once full, whichever is sooner.

If you have any queries about the course, kindly call us on Singapore 6521 3131, Hong Kong 8200 6005 or Kuala Lumpur 2782 6928.

Full course details and schedule can be viewed here.

Online registration is open here.

Online Psychometric Training Course – Basics of Psychometrics

Friday, December 17th, 2010

basic-psychometrics-course-

Basics of Psychometrics Online Training Course

This course runs over 5 weekly sessions, starting at 5.45pm on Tuesdays. Each session lasts for 40 minutes and there is time after this for questions and discussion. The course is subsidised by PsyAsia, but there is a small fee of just US$3.50 per week. You may choose to unsubscribe at any time but will not be able to re-subscribe thereafter. Each session will be recorded and all subscribers will get free access to the video recording for up to 14 days after the session so you will never miss a session even if you cannot attend live! Uploaded/recorded training sessions will cost US$10 per session for those who do not attend live/subscribe.

Note: This course is free to any client of PsyAsia who has purchased anything at all from us in the last 6 months as a thank you for your loyalty. If this is you, please contact us for alternative registration.

Session Dates and Topics
(all sessions start at 5.45pm Hong Kong/Singapore/Malaysia time)

  • Jan 5: The very basics – What are Psychometric Tests and why do we use them?
  • Jan 12: Understanding Psychometric Test Reliability and Validity
  • Jan 19: Principles in Administering, Scoring and Interpreting Psychometric Tests
  • Jan 26: How to use results from Psychometric Tests scientifically
  • Feb 2: Bringing it all together – A demonstration of the complete process from choosing tests based on requirements, preparing how to use the results, administering and generating online reports within a test system and finally using the data.

Register Here

Saville Consulting Wave & Prof. Peter Saville feature on BBC TV to discuss Leadership Assessment

Tuesday, November 30th, 2010

Saville Consulting Wave Personality Assessment Asia

Professor Peter Saville recently appeared on BBC TV to discuss the Saville Consulting Wave Psychometric Personality Assessment. The BBC’s Technology Correspondent, Rory Cellan-Jones underwent the Wave questionnaire and then received feedback from Professor Saville.

The Leadership Report discussed by Professor Saville is powered by Wave Professional Styles and based on Saville Consulting’s brand new Leadership Model. It has been validated both against theoretical leadership constructs and empirically using international workplace performance and effectiveness criterion data.

It combines styles, situations and underlying leadership potential to assess the impact of leadership on people, tasks and the growth of the organization as a whole. As it is based on the Wave model, the Leadership Report can also distinguish between motives and talents and highlights areas of potential over or under-rating.

The Leadership Report has a wide range of applications including in selection, succession planning, coaching or development and in assessing a leader’s fit to their environment.

PsyAsia International is offering a 15% discount on Saville Consulting Wave training for anybody who registers after viewing this video and before 15 December 2010. Use promotion code BBC when booking your place. The next courses will run in March 2011 in Singapore and Hong Kong. Full details at http://www.psyasia.com/saville-consulting-wave-training-module.php.

Leadership Report from Saville Consulting Wave

Online Psychometric Test Mini-Course: Lesson 6

Friday, September 24th, 2010

In this session we will explore the following:

1. Computer-based scoring of psychometric tests
2. Hand-scoring of psychometric tests
3. Norming of test results
4. The link between scoring of tests and reliability

Converting raw scores to standardised scores and using representative norms will be covered in a later session.

Once a psychometric test has been properly administered, it needs to be scored. Depending on the test chosen, you may have a few options.

a. You can opt for computer-based scoring.

This would work if you had administered the test using computer software or if you had asked your candidate to complete an online test. For online tests, this option is good because it is less likely to involve scoring errors! Your candidate completes the test online and then the system immediately and automatically scores the test. There is no additional input required and hence less chance for error. This pre-supposes the publisher has used the correct scoring algorithms of course. Whilst most reputable test publishers will, we do know of one who had an error in a test battery that was not spotted until one of their distributors pointed out that his partner had done poorly on a test for which she was a subject matter expert!!

If you administer the test to your candidate using desktop software, you should be able to automatically score it in the same way as above.

b. You can opt for hand-scoring or a bureau service or keyed input followed by computer-scoring. You are most likely to use this option if you administered the test to your candidate using hard-copy test booklets and answer sheets.

Firstly, you’ll need to double-check the answer sheets to ensure that there are no irregularities. Ensure that it’s obvious which answer the respondent selected. Be careful with any “blobs” that may have appeared from ink or pencil smudges etc. If a respondent has changed their mind after selecting a response and has crossed it out, ensure that you only use the most recent response in scoring.

For hand-scoring using a scoring key, you’ll next need to align the scoring key with the answer sheet. The exact requirements will vary based on the test you are using, so ensure that you read and fully understand the instructions provided by the test publisher.

Once you have scored the responses, double-check your scoring. You then need to record the score. The score you calculate at this point is called the RAW SCORE. On its own, a raw score means nothing. If I tell you that you scored 54 on a numerical reasoning test or 75 on the extraversion scale of a personality assessment, you’ll need to ask me more questions before you truly understand your score. The most important question to ask would be how your score compared to others. The comparison of your score with others is called norming.

It is called norming because we compare a candidate’s score to a group of others (called the norm group) who completed the test in the past. To undertake this comparison, you can do it by way of a simple calculation or through the use of norm tables either developed by yourself or, more usually, supplied by the test publisher.

Norm tables allow us to use a standard vocabulary for expressing a candidate’s score in relation to others who have taken the test and it is for this reason that we call your new score a standardised score. A standardised score is simply your candidate’s raw score, compared with the norm group and expressed in terms of how the candidate scored in relation to others. We’ll consider standardised scores in more detail in a later lesson. You’ll see by now that your objective is to calculate the candidate’s standard score as this is the way to achieve maximum meaning. If you opt for paper and pencil tests and hand-scoring, the process can be lengthy. So are there other options?

We have already seen above that we can simply have the candidate complete an online test. However, you may not wish to do this if there are many candidates. This is because you will need as many computers as candidates if you are going to supervise them. If you are using an unsupervised test, the candidate can complete on their own PC, but you may be concerned about possible cheating and so on. This is why you may end up using paper and pencil tests (in a supervised environment). However, there is an alternative to arduous hand-scoring if you have used paper and pencil tests.

You can use the bureau service of your psychometric test distributor. You just need to check that the answer sheet is properly completed, clear and free from any irregularities and then send the answer sheet to the distributor by fax or scanned email. The bureau service will then score the test for you and send you a report.

Furthermore, you may have another option yet. If you have access to a computer or online test system, you can probably also enter the candidate’s responses to each question into the system and have the system produce the report. This is essentially what the bureau service above does for you. Doing it yourself should work out cheaper. Do be careful when you transpose the responses though – accuracy is far more important than speed unless you want to invalidate the whole process!!

Self-scoring answer sheets: Some psychometric tests are supplied with self-scoring answer sheets. These are much easier to use than non-self-scoring answer sheets. In this case you usually need to open up the answer sheet by tearing off some perforated card. Inside the answer sheet, the candidate’s responses will have been duplicated via carbon or similar onto a scoring card. Usually, you add up the number of responses (often black circles) that appear inside a circle. Those outside of a circle represent incorrect answers so don’t get counted. Once you’ve added up correct responses, you have your raw score. Slightly different procedures obviously apply for personality assessments and fewer personality assessments provide self-scoring answer sheets due to their scoring complexity. When using self-scoring answer sheets you need to be especially careful to ensure that the candidate presses hard on the answer sheet when completing the test. If they are light-handed their responses may not come through onto the scoring card!

Finally, let’s consider the link between psychometric test scoring and reliability/validity. As you know, the test administrator can have a huge impact upon psychometric test reliability throughout the whole process. At the scoring stage you can affect reliability simply by scoring incorrectly. This might happen because you miss the fact that a candidate crossed out their answer and changed their mind. It may also happen because you try to score fast and just don’t add up correctly. Perhaps you use the scoring key incorrectly or perhaps the scoring is so arduous (often the case for personality assessments) that you simply get lost in the scoring or incorrectly use your calculator!

Ensure therefore that you fully understand how to score the test, use the scoring key as per the publisher’s instructions, score slowly and double check or have someone else double check your scoring. If possible, use computer based scoring or self-scoring answer sheets. Incorrect scoring reduces reliability and of course that means that a valid test can become invalid and a waste of time or money!

Interested in learning more about psychometric testing for HRM? Keep reading – your next free session is not far away! To ensure you don’t miss a single instalment, we suggest you follow-us on twitter as each new post will be announced there. You may also like to join our face-to-face psychometric training courses in Singapore or Hong Kong – these range from simple introductory courses through to Certification Courses such as the BPS Level A and BPS Level B Certificates of Competence in Occupational Testing. Not in Singapore or Hong Kong? No problem – we also offer both recorded and live online training in psychometrics! For full details please see here or email us.

DO NOT COPY OR SAVE THIS ARTICLE TO YOUR COMPUTER.
THIS ARTICLE IS CLEARED FOR PUBLISHING ON PSYCHOLOGY1 GROUP SITES ONLY. IT REMAINS COPYRIGHT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF PSYASIA INTERNATIONAL PTE. LTD. YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO PUBLISH IT ON ANY OTHER SITE. YOU ARE NOT PERMITTED TO COPY/PASTE THIS ARTICLE OR TO SAVE IT TO YOUR LOCAL DRIVE. YOU ARE ONLY PERMITTED TO READ IT ONLINE AT OUR WEBSITE. VIOLATION OF THESE TERMS WILL RESULT IN BANNING OF OFFENDING IPS AND LEGAL ACTION FOR THOSE WHO REPUBLISH THIS ARTICLE WHETHER IT BE WITH OR WITHOUT A REFERENCE TO THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR.

 
 
  • Recent Posts

  • Tags

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Aptitude Tests
    Professional Aptitudes
    Work Aptitudes
    Operational Aptitudes
    Commercial Aptitudes
    Customer Aptitudes
    Administrative Aptitudes
    Practical Aptitudes
    Swift Analysis Aptitude
    Swift Comprehension Aptitude
    Swift Technical Aptitude
    Personality Tests
    Saville Consulting Wave®
    Saville Consulting Wave Professional Styles
    Saville Consulting Wave Focus Styles
    Saville Consulting Wave Types
    Wave Entrepreneurial Potential
    Saville Consulting Wave Job Profiler
    Saville Consulting Performance Card Set
    Saville Consulting Wave Performance 360
    Wave Employee Development
    Wave Performance Culture
    Identity Personality Questionnaire
    Identity For Education
    The Apollo Profile
    Apollo Select Candidate Screening System
    Psychometric Training
    Psychometric Test Administration Course (with optional BPS Certification)
    BPS Level A and B Training (British Psychological Society Certification)
    Introduction to Psychometric Tests
    Apollo Profile Accreditation Course
    Identity Questionnaire Accreditation Course
    Saville Consulting Wave Conversion Course
    Saville Consulting Wave Full Training
    Free Psychometric Mini-Series
    Apollo Profile Online Learning
    Online Psychometric Training & Certification Courses
    Dates for all Psychometric Test Training Courses
    Register for Psychometric Training Courses
    Online Psychometric Test Systems
    Apollo Profile
    Identity Personality Questionnaire
    Saville Consulting Oasys™
    Test Administrator Network
    Bureau Scoring Service
    Psychometric Test Candidates
    Best Practice in Psychometrics
    Psychologist-on-Call™
    360° Performance Appraisal
    Knowledgebase & Journals
    Psychometrics Blog
    Online Psychometric Courses
    Search
    Email Us
    Call Us
    Sitemap
     
      Copyright © 2001-2012 PsyAsia International Pte. Ltd. A Psychology1 Group Site. All rights reserved.
      Psychometric Tests, Aptitude Tests & Personality Tests in Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, China, Pakistan,
      India, Thailand, Brunei, Dubai, UAE, Qatar, Australia, UK, USA and more!
    Follow us on Twitter   PsyAsia on Facebook   PsyAsia on YouTube   Tweet or Share this page
      Do Not Copy